Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: Howto use NyaN to add, subtract, muliply, divide
Replies: 24   Last Post: Feb 6, 2013 2:58 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Virgil Posts: 8,833 Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Howto use NyaN to add, subtract, muliply, divide
Posted: Feb 6, 2013 12:07 AM

In article
JT <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6 Feb, 00:55, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > On 5 Feb, 09:13, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > In article

> >
> > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 5 Feb, 00:21, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > > > > On 4 Feb, 07:34, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > When the formula to the NyaN completed, i would like to go on
> > > > > > > make the
> > > > > > > four elementar base arithemtic operations without any zeros,
> > > > > > > repeating
> > > > > > > never hurts.

> >
> > > > > > So for any given x in your notation, how does one express x - x
> > > > > > without
> > > > > > any zeroes?
> > > > > > --

> >
> > > > > I wrote it so many times but you refuse to accept it, there is no
> > > > > remainder so the difference is simply void
> > > > > =7-7
> > > > > =0,7-0,7

> >
> > > > But how does one differentiate a void as the result a subtraction of a
> > > > number from itself from not having any subtraction at all?

> >
> > > > Does "5 - 5 = " make any kind of sense?
> > > > --

> >
> > > For 5-5+9 you start with 5-5 and there is no remainder thus 9 not
> > > 0+9=9  for 5-5/9 thus /9 is no need to evaluate it is not a
> > > mathematical expression, and should not be taken further into a
> > > calculation
> > > thus (5-5)/9+21/3 *IS NOT* (0/9+21/3) it is simply 21/3 what i say is
> > > we should not evaluate none mathematical expressions.

> >
> > Is 9 - 9 a non-mathematical expression in your world?
> > It looks quite as mathematical as 9 - 8, at least to me.
> > --

>
> Well in my arethmitic it would of course be evaluated have *NO*
> remainder, but it would not be taken further into a calculation.

Thus 9 - 9 = "NO" in your arithmetic?

You version of arithmetic seems to cause more problems than it solves.
--

Date Subject Author
2/4/13 JT
2/4/13 JT
2/4/13 JT
2/4/13 JT
2/4/13 Virgil
2/4/13 JT
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13
2/5/13 Virgil
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 Virgil
2/5/13
2/5/13 Virgil
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 Virgil
2/5/13 JT
2/6/13 Virgil
2/6/13 JT
2/6/13 Virgil
2/6/13 JT
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13
2/5/13 JT
2/5/13 Virgil