Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.


JT
Posts:
1,267
Registered:
4/7/12


Re: Howto use NyaN to add, subtract, muliply, divide
Posted:
Feb 6, 2013 12:21 AM


On 6 Feb, 06:07, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <41ecd760e094437daffce4790e34e...@14g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 6 Feb, 00:55, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > In article > > > <0359085fd28e4b7f97aba309742f3...@y8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, > > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 5 Feb, 09:13, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > > In article > > > > > <b12ef8c3edc741719718a206477f5...@j9g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 5 Feb, 00:21, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 4 Feb, 07:34, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > When the formula to the NyaN completed, i would like to go on > > > > > > > > make the > > > > > > > > four elementar base arithemtic operations without any zeros, > > > > > > > > repeating > > > > > > > > never hurts. > > > > > > > > So for any given x in your notation, how does one express x  x > > > > > > > without > > > > > > > any zeroes? > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > I wrote it so many times but you refuse to accept it, there is no > > > > > > remainder so the difference is simply void > > > > > > =77 > > > > > > =0,70,7 > > > > > > But how does one differentiate a void as the result a subtraction of a > > > > > number from itself from not having any subtraction at all? > > > > > > Does "5  5 = " make any kind of sense? > > > > >  > > > > > For 55+9 you start with 55 and there is no remainder thus 9 not > > > > 0+9=9 for 55/9 thus /9 is no need to evaluate it is not a > > > > mathematical expression, and should not be taken further into a > > > > calculation > > > > thus (55)/9+21/3 *IS NOT* (0/9+21/3) it is simply 21/3 what i say is > > > > we should not evaluate none mathematical expressions. > > > > Is 9  9 a nonmathematical expression in your world? > > > It looks quite as mathematical as 9  8, at least to me. > > >  > > > Well in my arethmitic it would of course be evaluated have *NO* > > remainder, but it would not be taken further into a calculation. > > Thus 9  9 = "NO" in your arithmetic? > > You version of arithmetic seems to cause more problems than it solves. > 
no remainder



