On 2/10/2013 3:54 AM, WM wrote: > On 9 Feb., 21:39, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > >> What exceeds in length every fis is of not finite (infinite) length. > > In the list > > 1 > 11 > 111 > ... > > There is no FIS of the diagonal that is loinger than every line. > For everey line, there is a longer FIS of the diagonal. > For every FIS of the diagonal, there is a longer line.
And, so we see the confusion over the meaning of singular term.
And, so we see the confusion over the meaning of a definite article.
