Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » mathedcc

Topic: Responses to David Klahr's Criticism of Inquiry Science
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List   Topics: [ Previous | Next ]
Richard Hake

Posts: 1,218
From: Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Registered: 12/4/04
Responses to David Klahr's Criticism of Inquiry Science
Posted: Feb 18, 2013 1:04 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (3.6 K)

Some subscribers to MathEdCC might be interested in a recent post
"Responses to David Klahr's Criticism of Inquiry Science" [Hake
(2013)]. The abstract reads:

*************************************************
ABSTRACT: David Klahr's (2012) APS News back-page essay "Inquiry
Science rocks: Or does it?" at <http://bit.ly/WmqHMj> initiated two
long threads on the PhysLrnR list: (a) "Klahr in Dec. APSNEWS" at
<http://bit.ly/VsSA9u>, and (b) "Klahr In APS" at
<http://bit.ly/YdVI3q> [respectively 51 and 67 posts as of 17 Feb
2013; to gain access you may need to obtain a password by clicking on
"Log in required" and then typing your email address into a slot].

Unfortunately, none of these posts addressed Joe Bellina's lead
question at <http://bit.ly/W28x1k>: "HAS ANYONE THOUGHT OF
RESPONDING?" [My CAPS.]

Thus far the only response in APS News to Klahr (2012) is a letter in
the Feb 2013 issue "Criticism of Inquiry-based Learning Strikes Home"
at <http://bit.ly/ZghL0e> from physicist Robert Ehrlich (2013)],
which supports Klahr's criticism of Inquiry Science. Ehrlich
<http://bit.ly/VWihiQ> is an inveterate Physics Education Research
(PER) basher - see e.g., my response to his careless commentary in
"Comment on 'How do we know if we are doing a good job in physics
teaching' by Robert Ehrlich" [Hake (2002)] at <http://bit.ly/R4UZkt>.
*************************************************

To access the complete 14 kB post please click on <http://bit.ly/11PpLqs>.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Links to Articles: <http://bit.ly/a6M5y0>
Links to Socratic Dialogue Inducing (SDI) Labs: <http://bit.ly/9nGd3M>
Academia: <http://bit.ly/a8ixxm>
Blog: <http://bit.ly/9yGsXh>
GooglePlus: <http://bit.ly/KwZ6mE>
Google Scholar <http://bit.ly/Wz2FP3>
Twitter: <http://bit.ly/juvd52>
Facebook: <http://on.fb.me/XI7EKm>

REFERENCES [URL shortened by http://bit.ly/ and accessed on 18 Feb 2013.]
Hake, R.R. 2013. "Responses to David Klahr's Criticism of Inquiry Science,"
online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at <http://bit.ly/11PpLqs>. Post
of 17 Feb 2013 16:13:16-0800 to AERA-L and Net-Gold. The abstract
and link to the complete post are being transmitted to several
discussion lists and are also on my blog "Hake'sEdStuff" at
<http://bit.ly/150EexL> with a provision for comments.






Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.