Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.num-analysis.independent

Topic: The nature of gravity
Replies: 28   Last Post: Apr 11, 2014 4:14 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ] Topics: [ Previous | Next ]
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com

Posts: 57
Registered: 3/17/12
Re: The nature of gravity
Posted: Feb 23, 2013 2:10 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Saturday, 2 February 2013 16:58:15 UTC, haroldj...@gmail.com wrote:
> WHY IS THERE A RYDBERG LIMIT? THE ANSWER IS IN THE SURFACE GRAVITY.
>
>
>
> When the proton starts life as a primordial black hole it has a Gm product of
>
> 29.690606 and a gravitational radius of 6.60705x10^-16m, which is half the Compton wavelength of the proton, 1.32141x10^-15m.
> NATURAL UNITS:

.
> Much of our discussion revolves around dimensions made for the SI kilogram/second. These are just stretches of the true world made apt for our modern clocks and calendars.
The true world is measured in natural units like those of Planck and those of the proton. If we ignore the electron and neutron for the time being we can build a basic structure of natural units based on Planck and the proton like this:
In the matter of the proton opposite, Gm product 29,6906035, 3.2718065x10^-25m is definitely the diameter where g is equal to Planck g. The ratio between this and its Schwarzschild diameter, 1.3214x10^-15m, is 4.03877817x10^9. When it collapses to the Planck diameter, 2x4.05049049x10^-35m, the ratio is, again, 4.0387817x10^9.
In the whole, the fall from 1.3214x10-15m to the Planck diameter is
(4.03877817x10^9)^2 which comes to 1.631172911x10^19. The square of this is
2.660725065x10^38. So natural units can be considered as follows.

Mass:
Planck mass= 1 unit.
Proton Opposite(Gm=29.6906036)=1.6311729x10^19 Planck mass units.
Proton mass=1/1.6311729x10^19 Planck mass units.

Length:
Planck Length=1 unit.
Proton Opposite Schwarzschild diameter=1.6311729x10^19 Planck length units.
Proton Compton wavelength=1.6311729x10^19 Planck length units.
Proton Schwarzschild diameter=1/1.6311729x10^19 Planck length units.
Proton Opposite Compton wavelength=1/1.6311729x10^19 Planck length units.

Energy:
Planck h per Planck unit of time=1.
Rydberg energy in Planck time=1.777959912x10-27 Planck units of h.

Interestingly, 1.777959912x10^-27 divided by the proton mass, 1.672623x10^-27,
is 1.06297708 and (1.06297708x29.6906036)/2(3.62994678)^2=1.1976017, the
Rydberg adjustor. 3.62994678 is the quantum adjustor, an essential requirement
in the symmetrising process. The numerical structure of everything is like a huge suit of chain mail where every link is tailor made for the next piece to fit into. There is no place in the numerical structure of everything for such a pieceif it does not have symmetry. All you have to do is look hard enough.
If the piece does not fit then it does not belong to a symmetrical pattern. In which case you're barking up the wrong tree. Start again.



Date Subject Author
12/29/12
Read The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/3/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/4/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
1/22/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
2/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
2/23/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
3/16/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
4/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
4/25/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
5/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
5/4/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
5/6/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
6/1/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
8/13/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
8/24/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
9/9/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
9/19/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
henisdov@netvision.net.il
9/21/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/5/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
10/7/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/7/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/14/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
10/21/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
11/2/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com
11/19/13
Read Re: The nature of gravity
m.michael.musatov@gmail.com
4/11/14
Read Re: The nature of gravity
haroldj.l.jones@gmail.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.