In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 6 Mrz., 23:40, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > WM: I said always that L_m is a function > > > > WM: L_m is a single line. > > (L_m) is a fuction. > L_m is a single line. > > Are you really unable to understand? > > Regards, WM
To understand what goes on in Wolkenmuekenheim, everyone but WM is unable.
And where is WM's alleged proof that some function from the set of all binary sequences to the set of all paths of a CIBT is a linearfunction?
WM several times claimed it but cannot seem to prove it, at least not by any argument valid outside Wolkenmuekenheim.
So WM should either withdraw his claim or find a proof valid outside Wolkenmuekenheim. --