
Re: even numbers not the sum of TPs?
Posted:
May 24, 2013 7:26 PM


I was trying to see if it applied to prime quadruples (or B_4) ... and I did prove it, using a sloppyclever method, knowing that the postfermatistes generally like it if "it is true for sufficiently large (say) even numbers; so, I began with 200, and immediately hit a prime taht was not a sum of two quadruples ... or, was it four ... just using the quadruples that were listed on Wookypoopya.
> obviously, a proof of necessity is desirable, > as it always to be desired for a fermatiste.

