The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: An Unheralded Breakthrough: The Rosetta Stone of Mathematics
Replies: 6   Last Post: May 25, 2013 3:34 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Brian Q. Hutchings

Posts: 6,427
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: An Unheralded Breakthrough: The Rosetta Stone of Mathematics
Posted: May 25, 2013 3:34 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On May 24, 9:47 pm, Bart Goddard <> wrote:
> 1treePetrifiedForestLane <> wrote in news:ae93e4f1-

> > true, but he retracted that
> > in a letter to a Canadian in Quebec.

> >> Fermat was incorrect in asserting that 2^(2^n)+1 would always be
> >> prime.

> And, therefore, your assertion is false.  End of nonsense.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.