The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.symbolic

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Charlwood Fifty test results
Replies: 16   Last Post: Sep 19, 2013 10:09 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ] Topics: [ Previous | Next ]
Albert D. Rich

Posts: 311
From: Hawaii Island
Registered: 5/30/09
Re: Charlwood Fifty test results
Posted: Jul 6, 2013 8:12 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Saturday, July 6, 2013 11:53:22 AM UTC-10, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:

> On 7/6/2013 3:32 PM, Albert Rich wrote:
>> On problem 10, I entered the integrand as
>> x^3*exp(1)^arcsin(x)/sqrt(1-x^2)
>> whereas he probably entered it as
>> x^3*exp(arcsin(x))/sqrt(1-x^2)
>> Because of some bazaar quirk in Maple, it succeeds in integrating the former and not the latter!

> That is interesting. I wonder how you discovered this. It would
> never have occurred to me to try that.

It would never have occurred to me either. But the program I wrote that translates the problems from Mathematica to Maple syntax, translates expressions of the form E^z to exp(1)^z. This is because for some inexplicable reason Maple does not define a constant for the base of the natural logarithms, but does for the imaginary unit and pi. Go figure...


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.