The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 17   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 8:54 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 300
Posted: Jul 9, 2013 6:00 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:40:05 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:
> > Again WM overlooks that every ball inserted before noon is removed before
> > noon. The key is to note that such an infinite process cannot be analysed
> > by looking for a last step in the process, but only by looking for an
> > outside step which can only follow after all infinitely many steps within
> > the process are completed.

> But will not follow because I will never hand out all natural numbers. By
> contract I keep one. Is set theory unable to describe this task?

Since you are the one doing it, you are the one responsible for
describing it.

And we would be quite interested in finding out which of those natural
numbers you will claim to have retained until after noon.

Have you really found one that does not have any successors?

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.