The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Little Quantum Mechanics Question
Replies: 22   Last Post: Sep 22, 2003 12:50 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 914
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Little Quantum Mechanics Question
Posted: Sep 16, 2003 2:53 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <bk75eq$eoi$>, D.McAnally@i' (David McAnally) writes:
> writes:

>>>>>But, also, the postion operator, X , is an observable:
>>>>>X|x> = x|x>
>>>>>So one can expand |Psi> as:
>>>>>|Psi> = Integrate[ f(x)|x> , {x,0,L} ]
>>>In physics, maybe, but in math we tend to be more careful.

>>Yes, true. I admit that physicists tend to be kinda sloppy about
>>these things. Usually they can get away with this, but not always.
>>So, I plead guilty as charged.

>>>The position operator has a continuous spectrum. As George Jones
>>>observed, |x> is not a member of the Hilbert space, and X has
>>>_no_ eigenvectors, let alone an orthonormal basis of them.
>>>Mathematicians (or mathematical physicists) use various devices
>>>to deal with this, e.g. the "projection-valued measure" form of the
>>>Spectral Theorem.

>As I noted elsewhere, |x> actually DOES exist in the largest space of
>a Gelfand triple, the middle space of which is the Hilbert space.

Yes, only it doesn't exist within Hilbert space proper. In many
situations this distinction can be ignored. Sometimes, it cannot.

Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, | chances are he is doing just the same"

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.