The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Re: Cantor Paradox
Replies: 1   Last Post: Mar 12, 2004 12:03 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Danny Purvis

Posts: 176
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Cantor Paradox
Posted: Mar 12, 2004 10:09 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 12 Mar 2004, Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
>Fred Galvin <> writes:

>> Wow, sounds like Nathan has rediscovered Richard's Paradox (1905). Not
>> bad for an 11-year-old, if he really did think of himself.

>He's not an 11-year-old. Whether he's ever read Richard's Paradox or
>not, he clearly has the background to choose the issues carefully
>(I hadn't seen the paradox before, so I appreciate having a name
>attached to it.)
>Jesse F. Hughes
>"Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be, and
>if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic!"
> -- Lewis Carroll

I was going to dispute the fact that Nathan's paradox is identical to Richard's Paradox, but now I believe they are identical. I also really appreciate knowing the correct name for this fallacious but very amusing argument. Thanks, Fred Galvin. I used to read the news group geometry_research a lot, and one of the delightful aspects of that forum was that often John Conway would supply the correct names for things. Dr. Conway is also highly adept at coining new names as the occasion demands.

Danny Purvis

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.