Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Amateur math, neat relation
Replies: 38   Last Post: Sep 16, 2004 9:45 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Andrzej Kolowski

Posts: 353
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Posted: Sep 13, 2004 5:38 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


David C. Ullrich <ullrich@math.okstate.edu> wrote in message news:<sdm8k0pk7smh9jpkaq3t4db2ks6ph8mldr@4ax.com>...
> On 12 Sep 2004 03:48:58 -0700, jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote:
>

[snip]

> >In any event, remember a while back I said that I didn't think my
> >relation was new, and asked for a citation.
>
> a citation for an utter triviality.
>
> -i- just proved that
>
> 9767654654 + 90867531496 = 100635186150.
>
> i'm certain that this -is- new! anyone who says otherwise
> should give a citation.
>

As for the proof, I checked that the last digit is correct,
i.e., 0. By a basic principle of Harristotelian logic, if
something is true for m = 0 then it is true for all other
values also. So it checks out! Plus it is 'neat' and
of course 'fascinating'.

Andrzej



Date Subject Author
9/10/04
Read Amateur math, neat relation
JAMES HARRIS
9/10/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
C. BOND
9/10/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Mikito Harakiri
9/11/04
Read Harris-Harakiri identity
Mikito Harakiri
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Maksim Radziwill
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Mikito Harakiri
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Liviu
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
JAMES HARRIS
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Liviu
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
JAMES HARRIS
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
C. BOND
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Richard Henry
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Richard Tobin
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
JAMES HARRIS
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Jesse F. Hughes
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Jesse F. Hughes
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Richard Tobin
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Min@mygaff0.demon.co.uk
9/16/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Tim Smith
9/11/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Count Dracula
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
JAMES HARRIS
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
David C. Ullrich
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Richard Henry
9/13/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
David C. Ullrich
9/13/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Wayne Brown
9/13/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Andrzej Kolowski
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
C. BOND
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Liviu
9/13/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Wayne Brown
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
JAMES HARRIS
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
David C. Ullrich
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Dik T. Winter
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Jim Burns
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
C. BOND
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
JAMES HARRIS
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Dik T. Winter
9/12/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
lorez
9/13/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
David C. Ullrich
9/16/04
Read Re: Amateur math, neat relation
Tim Smith

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.