The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » k12.ed.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Lowest common denominator endangered?
Replies: 4   Last Post: Jan 13, 2005 5:49 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 20
Registered: 1/25/05
Lowest common denominator endangered?
Posted: Jan 2, 2005 4:40 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

The book I'm reading gives the algorithms for adding and subtracting

and similarly for subtraction. It notes that this "does not necessarily
give you the LCD". They do mention 4 methods for obtaining the LCD "if
desirable". That "if desirable" phrase appears three times. It never
mentions *how* desirable finding the LCD is, and the whole section on it
seems to be an afterthought.
Given the emphasis on calculators in the book, I'm wondering if the LCD
is still an issue, or is it considered nice to know, but don't spend
alot of time having child memorize how to find this. What is the current
thinking on LCD and does it come up on the standardized testing everyone
is barking about?
I have no memory of being taught fractions, and, when I put myself to a
set of them, I found I used a combo of good guess and reduction after
calculating, with a pinch of prime numbers sprinkled over the good
guess. Not a method given to methodical instruction.

submissions: post to k12.ed.math or e-mail to
private e-mail to the k12.ed.math moderator:
newsgroup website:
newsgroup charter:

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.