The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » k12.ed.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Lowest common denominator endangered?
Replies: 4   Last Post: Jan 13, 2005 5:49 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 354
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Lowest common denominator endangered?
Posted: Jan 13, 2005 5:49 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply wrote on 01/13/2005:

>The book I'm reading gives the algorithms for adding and subtracting
>and similarly for subtraction. It notes that this "does not necessarily
>give you the LCD". They do mention 4 methods for obtaining the LCD "if
>desirable". That "if desirable" phrase appears three times. It never
>mentions *how* desirable finding the LCD is, and the whole section on it
>seems to be an afterthought.
>Given the emphasis on calculators in the book, I'm wondering if the LCD
>is still an issue, or is it considered nice to know, but don't spend
>alot of time having child memorize how to find this. What is the current
>thinking on LCD and does it come up on the standardized testing everyone
>is barking about?
>I have no memory of being taught fractions, and, when I put myself to a
>set of them, I found I used a combo of good guess and reduction after
>calculating, with a pinch of prime numbers sprinkled over the good
>guess. Not a method given to methodical instruction.

Lowest Common Denominator is an important concept for knowledge and skill
development. Using LCD often helps in keeping arithmetic steps simpler, making
simplifications later in the final answer easier.

The algorithm you quote is used exactly as you quoted only when the
denominators, b, and d, have no common factor; when they do have a common
factor, you may find a Lowest Common Denominator, but you can yet use the
algorithm which you quoted in order to obtain a Common Denominator, which will
still work.

Relax! Arithmetic is still arithmetic. With Algebra, at least you understand
the rules more clearly.


submissions: post to k12.ed.math or e-mail to
private e-mail to the k12.ed.math moderator:
newsgroup website:
newsgroup charter:

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.