The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » k12.ed.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Weighted Averages (Question)
Replies: 1   Last Post: Dec 1, 2004 12:31 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Brian Harvey

Posts: 26
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Weighted Averages (Question)
Posted: Dec 1, 2004 12:31 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply (Julie) writes:
>Hello, I was having a bit of trouble understanding something with
>weighted averages. Suppose I have the following formula for per-pupil
>revenue in a given state: Total Revenue (in a given state)/Average
>Daily Attendance (in a given state). Now if I want to find the average
>per-pupil revenue across the whole U.S. wouldn't I take the sum of all
>total revenues in the U.S.(sum each of the 50 states) and divide that
>by the sum of all Average Daily Attendance figures in the U.S. (sum
>each of the 50 states)?? Wouldn't this be a weighted average of
>per-pupil revenue that is more accurate than taking the sum of all
>total revenues and dividing by the number of states?? I'm just having
^^^^^ [should say per-pupil]
>problems relating this calculation to the basic weighted average
>formula (sum of weight*quanitities/sum of quantities). Is the "weight"
^^^^^^^^^^ [should be weights]
>in my calculation the Average Daily Attendance??

Everything you say is correct, apart from the two small mistakes
noted above. In your computation, you are starting
with the figures for total revenue and for ADA, for each state. So it's
clearly right to add total revenues (straightforwardly) and add ADAs
(with the caveats you mention later in your message).

But suppose you happened to be given the per-pupil revenues rather than
the total revenues. In that case, you might be tempted to add the
per-pupil revenues, since that's what you have! And the weighted
average formula is telling you that you're not allowed to do that,
but must instead recover the total revenues by multiplying each
state's per-pupil revenue by its ADA. In the vocabulary of the
formula, you weight each state's per-pupil revenue by its population
(which is essentially what ADA measures, since for this purpose
"population" means "population attending school").

As for computing the average ADA, given the complexities in the
formulas used, I'd be inclined to say that there is *no* honest way
to average such unlike numbers. Instead you'd have to compute your
own ADA figures for each state, using the same formula for each,
starting from their raw daily attendance numbers.

submissions: post to k12.ed.math or e-mail to
private e-mail to the k12.ed.math moderator:
newsgroup website: <a href=""></a>
newsgroup charter: <a href=""></a>

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.