Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: "e"
Posted:
Dec 10, 2004 5:34 PM


"Jerry Beeler" <jerrybeeler@att.net> writes: >Can anyone give me (1) a "non calculus" oriented derivation or explanation >for "e", and (2) an example or two of where "it often appears in physics and >math".
The conceptually simplest definition of e is that it's the number such that the area bounded by y=1/x, y=0, x=1, and x=e is 1. But that isn't a really satisfying definition  it doesn't explain why e is important.
That's why you usually see an explanation that uses, if not calculus, at least limits: most often, the one about continuously compounded interest.
Personally I like to define e^x by its Taylor series, because if you also show (and verify by examples) the Taylor series for sin x and cos x, you can get to one of (imho) the most beautiful things in mathematics, Euler's formula e^{i\theta} = \cos \theta + i \sin \theta and its special case e^{i\pi} + 1 = 0 which is what made me a math lover back in high school.
 submissions: post to k12.ed.math or email to k12math@k12groups.org private email to the k12.ed.math moderator: kemmoderator@k12groups.org newsgroup website: <a href="http://www.thinkspot.net/k12math/">http://www.thinkspot.net/k12math/</a> newsgroup charter: <a href="http://www.thinkspot.net/k12math/charter.html">http://www.thinkspot.net/k12math/charter.html</a>



