Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
PI Value and NASA Space Shuttles Errors of Trajectory
Posted:
May 16, 2003 10:41 PM
|
|
Since 1991 NASA Senior Engineers realized that the cause of explosion
of Challenger during 1986 was not in the "verdict" of The White House
that Challenger exploded of "cold cause" but SOMETHING that had to do
with the control of the FORCE OF EXPLOSION generated by the Solid Fuel
Engines.
Unfortunately the american society was not prepared during 1991 to the
openes of a scientific investigation,Special Interests won through
having the NASA Senior Engineers sillenced by The White House, and
when was realized what grave financial loss would be for big USA
Aerospace Companies and for the dignity and honour of USA Universities
and USA National Academy of Science, this matter became unpleasant
and... politicaly not convenient.
In this article the international scholars shall have under the eye
THE NUMERICAL ERRORS generatted by the science of mathematics PI
Value,and also THE NUMERICAL EXACTITUDE seen when the Geometrical
Proportion is seen through THE GEOMETRICAL PI VALUE.
PI Value of the Science of mathematics = 3.141592654...
PI Value of the American Civilization's Geometry = 3.146264371...
Base Diagonal plus Volume Diagonal of Cube of edge=2 is = 6.292528742
Ratio between an inscribed Circle of R=1 in a Square by the PI Value
of the Science of mathematics = 1.273239545
Ratio between an inscribed Circle of R=1` in a Square by the PI Value
of the American Civilization's Geometry = 1.271348981
Now let's verify:
Verification for 360 degrees by ratio of 1.273239545
(360 degrees : 1.273239545):6.292528742 = 44.93318194
Verification for 360 degrees by ratio of 1.271348981
(360 degrees : 1.271348981): 6.292528742
= 45
Warning!
Note the values of "44.93318194" vizavi "45".
At "45" we have a COMPLETE NUMERICAL CONTROL while at "44.93318194" we
have a loos seen as 45 - 44.93318194 = .06681806.
Now take the Error seen as .06681806 and divde by 360 degres and you
shall have the Error for 1 deegre = ..00018560..., then multiply this
Error by the SPEED of NASA Space Shuttle and you have the image of the
gravity of loos of control that appears through the use of the PI
Value of the Science of Mathematics.
Source:
AMERICAN CIVILIZATION'S GEOMETRY
(The Prosecution File of the Civilization)
Page 7
Copyright 2001-2002-2003 by Ion Vulcanescu
ISBN 1-889124-06-0
US Library of Congress # TX 5-424-946
Contact Address:
Mr Ion Vulcanescu - Philosopher
Independent Researcher in Geometry
Author,Editor and Publisher
125 Main Street, POB-166
Hurleyville,NY 12747
Telephone/Fax 845-434-1324
Note:
To further research the scientific data indicated here see the
articles posted here to Geometry-Annnouncement:
Apr 23 2003 -Invalidation of Calculus through "DNA Concept"...
Apr. 23 2003 -Invalidation of PI Value...
Apr. 23 2003 -The Errors of the French Metric System...
Apr. 28 2003 -Homage to Hugh Harleston Jr. ...
May 10 2003 -The Origin of the Circle's 360 degrees...
As one may ask why was the Cube of edge=2 Base Diagonal plus Volume
Diagonal (6.292528742) used,it must now be stated that as it is known
that Sphere to correctly inscribe in a Cube the Sphere's volume must
touch the Cube's 6 sides in the center of each side, it also must be
understood that the sum of this Cube's Base Diagonal Plus Volume
Diagonal is also...the Value of the Circle's Circumference for a
circle of R=1 when using the Geometric PI Value of 3.146264371...
But if one research the articles indicated herein above he or she
shall fully understand WHY a Sphere of R=1 made by PI Value of the
science of mathematics DOES NOT touch the cube's 6 sides...or if
touches... such "cube" is not a cube but...a PRISM for that Cube to be
AT ALL THE TIME of edge= 2 it must also AT ALL THE TIME have its edges
perpendicular on each other...and it is this PERPENDICULARY EFFECT
that allways shall keep the numerical value of 6.292528742...
Any other "cube" of edge 2 shall never be a cube but a PRISM for that
if the value of 6.292528742 became SMALLER or BIGGER such geometric
body is not anymore a cube but...a PRISM.
Ion Vulcanescu
|
|
|
|
