Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof
Posted:
Apr 8, 2005 10:50 AM
|
|
Wall Street Journal
April 8, 2005
As the Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof
By SHARON BEGLEY
The English mathematician G.H. Hardy (1877-1947) was an avowed atheist,
but not above hedging his bets. Whenever he had to cross the Channel,
he mailed postcards to friends saying he had proved the "Riemann
hypothesis," an intriguing mathematical conjecture about prime numbers
that had been proposed (but not proved) by Bernhard Riemann in 1859. By
the early 20th century the Riemann hypothesis had become a Holy Grail
for mathematicians. Hardy was therefore sure that if, on the off
chance, God did exist, He would never let Hardy take the proof,
unpublished, to a watery grave (Hardy also was apparently sure God
would fall for the empty boast on the postcard).
In the decades since, the legend of the Riemann hypothesis has only
grown, becoming "the most important unsolved problem in mathematics,"
says mathematician Dan Rockmore of Dartmouth College, author of a nifty
new book, "Stalking the Riemann Hypothesis: The Quest to Find the
Hidden Law of Prime Numbers." Since 2000, the problem also has had a
bounty on its head. The Clay Mathematics Institute, a private group in
Cambridge, Mass., is offering $1 million to the first person who can
prove it.
The prize sits unclaimed. But after a century of progress that can
charitably be described as fitful, "frustration has begun to give way
to excitement, for the pursuit of the Riemann hypothesis has begun to
reveal astounding connections among nuclear physics, chaos and number
theory," Prof. Rockmore says.
What these appear to have in common is prime numbers, because deep down
the Riemann hypothesis describes in detail how prime numbers are
sprinkled along the number line. Primes are numbers that can be evenly
divided only by themselves and 1. So 3, 5, 7, 11 and 13 are prime, as
are 199, 409, 619, 829, 1039, 1249, 1459, 1669, 1879, 2089.
This last string is curious because the primes in it all are separated
by 210. Last spring, two mathematicians proved that there exist strings
(separated not by 210 but by other intervals) that contain an
arbitrarily-long run of primes. That is, you can find a number, keep
adding another number to it and get a run of primes as long as you
like. Because prime numbers underlie digital cryptography and Internet
security, such deep truths have become more than mere oddities.
An early discovery about the primes was that there is an infinite
number of them, sprinkled "like indivisible stars scattered without end
throughout a boundless numerical universe," Prof. Rockmore writes. But
how infinite? Although most of us think of infinity as one big number,
some infinities are bigger than others. The number of numbers divisible
by 2 is infinite, and so is the number divisible by 9. But the first
infinity is bigger. There also is an infinite number of squares (4, 9,
16 ...) and cubes (8, 27, 64 ...), but more primes than either.
In 1859, Riemann got an inkling of how the primes thin out as you go
along the number line. The number of primes around a particular number,
he knew, equals the reciprocal of (that is, 1 divided by) the natural
logarithm of that number. The natural logarithm of a number equals how
many times you have to multiply a number called e (about 2.718) by
itself to get that number. At around one million, whose logarithm is
about 13, every 13th number or so is prime. At one billion, whose log
is about 21, about every 21st number is prime.
Riemann wanted to fathom why the heck primes were related to
logarithms. He suspected he might find a clue in a formula that adds up
1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1-over-every-other-counting-number, but with the
twist that each fraction is raised to an exponent (multiplied by itself
some number of times). For bizarre exponents -- those that use the
imaginary number the square root of -1 -- this sum equals zero. Riemann
guessed at the general form of these "magical exponents." If his
hypothesis is right, then mathematicians will know how primes thin out
along the number line.
Proving the hypothesis means proving that every exponent of the form
Riemann described makes the sum of the fractions zero. For more than a
century mathematicians have been testing the magical exponents. In 1903
a researcher checked the first 15. By the 1930s, others had verified
the first 1,000. By 1968, they had 3.5 million. Two years ago an IBM
researcher using 500 computers verified the first 50 billion.
But that doesn't count as proving all of Riemann's exponents work. What
if the 50-billionth-and-1st doesn't? The $1 million still is up for
grabs.
The stakes are actually higher. The Riemann hypothesis now has been
shown to underlie a plethora of puzzles in physics and math. The
pattern of his magical exponents is related to the energies of
particles in atomic nuclei, the energies of waves that fit precisely on
geometric surfaces that describe space in Einstein's general theory of
relativity, waiting times on bank lines and even how many cards you
have to move to order the hand you're dealt in bridge. Why that should
be so is -- depending how you look at it -- a coincidence, a profound
truth of nature, or proof that God has a sense of humor. Maybe Hardy
had the right idea with those postcards.
|
|
|
|
