The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Professional Associations » ncsm-members

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: NMP: Worry about potential bias?
Replies: 8   Last Post: May 29, 2006 9:09 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Linda Gojak

Posts: 13
Registered: 9/9/05
Fwd: NMP: Worry about potential bias?
Posted: May 26, 2006 8:17 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (15.7 K)

I think it is important for all of us to keep up on what is going on
with the National Mathematics Panel.

While I am glad there is a teacher on the panel, I am concerned
about his biases.


Linda Gojak
President, NCSM
An organization of Leaders in Mathematics Education

"To lead people, walk beside them ... As for the best leaders, the
people do not notice their existence. The next best, the people honor
and praise. The next, the people fear; and the next, the people
hate ... When the best leader's work is done the people say, 'We did
it ourselves!'" Lao-Tsu

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Jerry Becker <>
> Date: May 25, 2006 12:56:34 PM EDT
> To:
> Subject: NMP: Worry about potential bias?
> *************************
> From Education Week, Wednesday, May 24, 2006, Volume 25, Issue 38,
> p. 8. See
> 2006/05/19/38mathpanel.h25.html -- may require subscription.
> *************************
> Some Worry About Potential Bias on the National Math Panel
> By Sean Cavanagh
> Supporters of a new expert panel on mathematics are confident it
> will help identify national strategies for improving student
> learning in that subject-even as critics ask whether its members
> have the classroom teaching experience, and the objectivity, needed
> to accomplish that mission.
> The National Mathematics Advisory Panel, whose 17 voting members
> President Bush named last week, includes a number of mathematicians
> and cognitive and developmental psychologists from across the country.
> But the advisory group, which was scheduled to meet for the first
> time May 22 in Washington, has only one member who currently
> teaches in a K-12 school, a lack of representation that some
> observers find puzzling, given the panel's stated purpose of
> exploring math teaching and learning from basic math through
> subjects such as calculus.
> Others worry that the panelists' backgrounds suggest they will
> favor a particular approach to teaching math-generally speaking,
> one that stresses the need for drill and practice in basic
> computation at early grade levels, at the expense of problem solving.
> "It does not represent a balanced view of mathematics," contended
> Steven Leinwand, a principal research analyst at the American
> Institutes for Research, a private research organization in
> Washington that studies behavior and social-science issues. He
> believes that teachers should cultivate students' skills in
> understanding broader math concepts, along with basic skills.
> The panel needs a stronger voice from "the excellent classroom
> teachers working with students day in, day out," Mr. Leinwand
> added. "We instead have experts on teaching mathematics at the
> college level."
> 'Cut Through the Noise'
> Similar charges of bias dogged the National Reading Panel, formed
> in 1997, which Bush administration officials have said is a model
> for the math group.
> The reading panel ended up recommending a strong emphasis on
> teaching phonics, a classroom strategy using a basic-skills
> approach that critics say the administration tends to favor in the
> awarding of billions of dollars in federal reading grants.
> Others, however, say worries about a biased math panel are
> overblown. Tom Loveless, a senior scholar at the Brookings
> Institution who was selected for the panel, has written about
> American students' weaknesses in arithmetic, and he acknowledges
> that some skeptics are likely to question his objectivity. But Mr.
> Loveless, a former 6th grade public school teacher, said he favors
> building a range of student math skills, and he believes other
> panelists are similarly broad-minded.
> "It's very clear that our jobs here are not to go in with any kind
> of an agenda," he said. "It's an opportunity to cut through a lot
> of the noise surrounding math."
> President Bush established the panel as part of a broader, $380
> million proposal aimed at improving student performance in math and
> science and making the United States more competitive
> internationally. A second piece of that proposal would have the
> federal government take a stronger role in promoting instructional
> strategies in that subject that are backed up by research.
> For years, disputes over how to teach math, known as the "math
> wars," have pitted those who say students need more grounding in
> basic skills against those who argue that more attention should be
> paid to building their problem-solving abilities.
> Many educators and researchers who once fought those battles have
> called for détente. While disagreements remain, they say, educators
> generally agree that students need a balance between knowing number
> facts and basic procedures and having a broad understanding of math
> concepts.
> Consensus Emerging
> Various factions of math educators have long accused the National
> Council of Teachers of Mathematics, an influential, 100,000-member
> organization in Reston, Va., of placing too little emphasis on the
> basics.
> But NCTM President Francis M. "Skip" Fennell, who was named to the
> panel, said he is willing to believe the commission could work past
> disagreements. "I'm certainly going into it with an open mind," he
> said. "I have to be positive."
> One panelist and past critic of the NCTM, Harvard University
> mathematics professor Wilfried Schmid, reiterated his view that
> students should be "computationally fluent." But he also believes
> that advocates from different camps are working more cooperatively
> today. He noted that he had joined other scholars and business
> representatives in identifying skills that individuals on different
> sides of past "math wars" would regard as crucial-from students'
> understanding of fractions and algorithms to their proper use of
> calculators and their ability to do problems in real-world
> contexts. "We can see some consensus emerging," he said.
> Several panelists and outside observers said they believe far less
> research is available on effective K-12 math teaching than in
> subjects such as reading. A major charge of the panel will be to
> identify the existing research and where more study is needed.
> Vern S. Williams, a math teacher at Longfellow Middle School in the
> 164,000-student Fairfax County, Va., school system, is the only
> panelist who is now a K-12 teacher.
> On a Web site he set up on math topics, Mr. Williams has criticized
> the NCTM for promoting what he sees as "fuzzy" math standards. In
> an interview, he suggested the panel could encourage schools to
> require more demanding math lessons of elementary and middle school
> students. Many educators today, he said, wrongly assume that
> children cannot handle that work.
> "We've been focusing for so long on pedagogy and teaching methods,"
> Mr. Williams said. "We need to focus on what to teach."
> *********************************
> --
> Jerry P. Becker
> Dept. of Curriculum & Instruction
> Southern Illinois University
> 625 Wham Drive
> Mail Code 4610
> Carbondale, IL 62901-4610
> Phone: (618) 453-4241 [O]
> (618) 457-8903 [H]
> Fax: (618) 453-4244
> E-mail:

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.