The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: About the proof that L1 is the dual of c0
Replies: 9   Last Post: Nov 6, 2006 9:08 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Lynn Kurtz

Posts: 1,278
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: About the proof that L1 is the dual of c0
Posted: Oct 21, 2006 5:25 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 21 Oct 2006 08:16:28 -0700, "nkorppi" <>

>On page 104 of these Functional Analysis notes
>( , the author gives
>a proof that L1 is the dual of c0.
>On the next page he explains the general argument, due to Hahn-Banach,
>which shows that L1 is not the dual of L{infinity}.
>However, in the proof itself, I cannot really see how the fact that
>sequences converge to zero is used? How would the 'onto' -part of the
>proof go wrong if c0 were to be replaced by L{infinity}?
>I'm going beserks trying to figure it out...

And of course you have the author's permission to post these notes for
all the world to copy.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.