Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Courses » ap-calculus

Topic: O&Z for BC?
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
John Owens

Posts: 6
Registered: 12/6/04
O&Z for BC?
Posted: Jun 18, 1997 9:23 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I'm switching jobs this Fall (from the Math Dept at East Carolina U. to
chair the Math Dept. at Savannah Country Day School) and will be teaching BC
Calculus this Fall for the first time (I've taught Calc I, II, II,
Polynomial Calculus, and Calculus for Life Sciences many times).

The school has been using Larson, Hostetler & Edwards but I'm concerned with
the match to the AP syllabus. In particular it does not do justice to new
BC topics like Slope Fields, Logistic Equations, and Euler's Method for
D.E.'s. Plus, I don't think this text fits the philosophy of the new AP
very well.

I looked at Ostebee & Zorn in the past and was impressed--but my copy is in
a box in a garage in N.C. Checking the outline on O&Z's web page, the only
topic I can't find that's in the AP syllabus is vectors.

Can someone more familiar with O&Z please give me an idea of what might be
missing or lightly covered for a BC course?

Any comments on O&Z as a BC text for a program that sends it's best students
to Ivy League Schools, MIT, etc.? (Is this a valid/politically
correct/relevant question?)

Thanks,

John Owens





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.