The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Courses » ap-calculus

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Re: Reply to Jerry Rosen
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Dave Slomer

Posts: 244
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Reply to Jerry Rosen
Posted: Jun 19, 1997 3:56 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

> From: jerry rosen <>
> Some of you asked about omissions from the Harvard text. Below is a list
> of omissions and severe weaknesses.

I can't find my copy of Harvard. Maybe it so scared me as to make me burn

In any event, I don't think its omissions and weaknesses ought to be used
against the whole reform movement.

Now that I see an "official" list of omissions--ESPECIALLY RELATED RATES--I
am beginning to wonder why ANYBODY would choose it.

But there are definitely good books with nowhere near as many omissions. As
I recall, in 1994, my concern was more with the lack of L'Hopital's rule,
continuity, and its treatment of limits. That was enough for me. I don't
recall shock at noticing no related rates--are you SURE they aren't in
there somewhere?

Dave Slomer
AP Calculus and Computer Science Teacher
Winton Woods HS, Cincinnati, OH 45240

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.