The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Courses » ap-calculus

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Re: to Dave, Jerry and the list
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Lawrence Braden

Posts: 24
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: to Dave, Jerry and the list
Posted: Jun 29, 1997 5:35 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


>Reform stresses analysis (algebra) along with (equally) the numerical,
>>graphical and verbal; it does not stress only the numerical, graphical
>and >verbal. Think of it as more numerical, graphical and verbal than
>previously, >not less algebra.
>Lin McMullin
>Ballston Spa, NY

This is the problem. Something's gotta give here, gang. If the numerical,
graphical and verbal are all stressed equally, algebra must give. It does.
We all teach calculus under finite constraints; when something is added,
something else must go.

This is not a good thing or a bad thing, it just is a REAL thing. I no
longer have TIME to teach centers of mass or moments of inertia, for
instance. So my students are considerably weaker at finding volumes,
surface areas and arc lengths, with or without calculators. Hopefully they
are skilled at something else equally important.

It is ironic that numerical analysis, once deemed so important, is being
cut entirely from the AP syllabus. Simpson's wonderful rule is no more.
So Runga-Kutta is really going to be catch-up time for them in about two or
three years into their math careers. Who will design the calculators and
computers of tomorrow?

Lawrence S. Braden
St. Paul's School
Concord, NH 03301

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.