Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Math Topics » geometry.research.independent

Topic: Is physical space at minimum 4D?
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Clifford J. Nelson

Posts: 221
Registered: 12/6/04
Is physical space at minimum 4D?
Posted: Nov 4, 2007 9:03 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


>From Synergetics: "The specialists brief on brevity is dubious".

Is gimbal lock a hint that the definition of physical space as three
dimensional instead of four dimensional is just a case of too much
brevity by mathematicians?

The reason I ask is that you can define physical space as four
dimensional like the Synergetics coordinate system, which is from the
tetrahedron, described at:
and a method to overcome gimbal lock uses four dimensional unit

And the Pythagoreons might have had the right idea at:


Cliff Nelson

Dry your tears, there's more fun for your ears,
"Forward Into The Past" 2 PM to 5 PM, Sundays,
California time,
Don't be a square or a blockhead; see:

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.