|
|
Re: A flaw with Venkat Reddy's arithmetic.
Posted:
Dec 17, 2007 12:29 AM
|
|
mike3 a écrit :
>>
>>> This is also fine. But that doesn't mean it
>>> produces a finite extent of continuum, unless you take real numbers
>>> *are* the continuum, which we could not establish so far.
>> No. The proof that a set with beth-one real numbers can have finite
>> extent is a fairly elementary proof, that does not involve any
>> concept of "contiuum", just the definition of measure.
>> The proof is not difficult, but you will not find it on Wikipedia.
>> You will need to consult an introductory measure theory text.
>>
>
> What about another free (gratis) source that is NOT Wikipedia?
Why not try making your own proofs?
And why bother with that troll ? (anybody mentioning beth-1 (and
wikipedia, etc.) for a (lack of) proof that singletons of reals have
(Lebesgue) measure 0 ans intervals have measure (b-a)>0 *is* a troll.)
>
|
|
