Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Exterior Angle without parallels?
Replies: 1   Last Post: Dec 21, 2007 2:18 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Rich Kleinschmidt Posts: 31 Registered: 12/6/04
Exterior Angle without parallels?
Posted: Dec 11, 2007 2:34 PM

Hello friends. Is anyone still out there?

I have been using Harold Jacobs "Geometry-Seeing, Doing, Understanding" for the first time this year.

I have enjoyed his approach and he has given me some good insights for other geometry classes I teach, but....

In Chapter 5 (Theorem 12) he offers the theorem:
An exterior angle of a triangle is greater than either remote interior angle.

Certainly not controversial except that he does it before introducing the parallel postulate. Later he uses it in the NonEuclidean chapter (Theorem 89) to prove:
"If the legs of a birectangular quadrilateral are unequal, the summit angles opposite them are unequal in the same order."

My problem is that I don't think the theorem applies in at least some geometries. For example in spherical, couldn't we have a triangle with the longitude 0, longitude 100 and the equator? Wouldn't the exterior angles be less than or equal the remote interior angles?

Am I missing something or did Harold Jacobs miss something. I think his mistake (P191 step 10) is an assumption about betweeness.

Any insights welcome. (I really like this text for our lower level classes.)

Rich Kleinschmidt
Bishop Brady High School
Concord, NH 03301
kleinschmidt@att.net

Date Subject Author
12/11/07 Rich Kleinschmidt
12/21/07 Alexander Bogomolny