The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Math Topics » geometry.research

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Another simple-seeming theorem with no proof - yet?
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Steve Gray

Posts: 103
Registered: 7/6/07
Another simple-seeming theorem with no proof - yet?
Posted: Dec 15, 2007 11:37 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Five points in the plane in general convex position are labeled A-E.
No three lie in a line and no four lie in a circle. "Convex position"
means that a pentagon with vertices A-E is convex by the standard
definition. Draw all 10 distinct circles (ABC, ABD, ABE, ACD, ACE,
ADE, BCD, BCE, BDE, CDE) through these points. Call this configuration
Each point A-E in X(5,10) is assigned a "depth" d, according to how
many circles strictly enclose it. (It is true but not obvious that
d(A)+d(B)+d(C)+d(D)+d(E) = 10.) Relabel the points in clockwise or
counterclockwise order such that d(A)=0 and d(B)=4.
Show that this is always possible, and further that d(C)=1, d(D)=2,
and d(E)=3. (The sequence d(A),…,d(E) is 0,4,1,2,3, NOT 0,4,3,2,1.)
Finally, show that any configuration X(5,10) is isomorphic to any
other. Here isomorphic means that any X(5,10) can be transformed to be
geometrically similar to any other with no points crossing any
circles, with reflection allowed.
In other words, topologically there is exactly one X(5,10)
I have established this result by means of many experiments but have
not been able to prove it. Do not try to prove that the intersection
of all 10 circle interiors is non-null; it may seem true but there are

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.