The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Math Topics »

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: -- Lune and lens: correct definitions?
Replies: 9   Last Post: Mar 26, 2008 4:10 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
David W. Cantrell

Posts: 827
Registered: 7/2/06
-- Lune and lens: correct definitions?
Posted: Jan 20, 2008 10:25 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

The notion of a crescent or lune was discussed recently in
alt.math.recreational. Interested readers might look at my second posting
(Nov. 12) in the thread "crescent shapes"


In particular, I expressed doubt about the definitions of lune and
lens given at MathWorld: <> and
<>. My guess is that the distinction
based on whether the radii are equal or not is solely due to Eric
Weisstein. OTOH, I am also slightly uneasy with my suggestion there that
the distinction between lune and lens should be one of convexity. After
all, an optical lens need not be convex in section and, when the Moon is
gibbous, the lighted part that we see from Earth is convex. Partially due
to my uncertainty, I have not yet written to Eric to try to get his entries
for lune and lens corrected. If anyone can shed light on what is "correct",
historically or otherwise, I would appreciate it!

My idea:

Given two circular disks, A and B, having a nonempty intersection and such
that neither is entirely contained in the other, three regions are formed.
(Think of a Venn diagram.) One of the regions, A /\ B, is convex; I suggest
that "lens" be used to name that kind of shape. Neither of the other two
regions, A-B and B-A, is convex; I suggest that "lune" be used to name that
kind of shape.

I also suggest that a circular disk itself should be considered a
degenerate case of both the lune and the lens.

Comments please!

David W. Cantrell

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.