The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Math Topics » discretemath

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Logical Graphs
Replies: 4   Last Post: Mar 3, 2008 4:07 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jon Awbrey

Posts: 36
Registered: 12/10/04
Logical Graphs
Posted: Feb 1, 2008 11:00 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


Ben Brink wrote:
> Jon,
> Using deMorgan's Law, statement should be equivalent
> to (~p ^ ~q) v (~p ^ q). If I'm not mistaken, there's
> a "distributive" law which says this is equivalent to
> ~p ^ (q v ~q). This last should be equivalent to ~p.
> To me this is easier than the graphs.
> Ben


But it would be necessary to write out all the steps
in order to have a fair comparison of prove complexity.

This formulation of logical graphs is based on the work that
C.S. Peirce (1839-1914) did on various systems of graphical
logics. These ideas were revived again in the late 60's by
George Spencer Brown, who wrote a book called ''Laws of Form''.
They also formed the basis of John Sowa's "Conceptual Graphs",
which remain under active development to this day.

When I began working on computerized theorem proving in the late 1970's
I quickly discovered that the formulation given here was especially well
suited to computational methods. One reason for this is that everything
is based on only four basic axioms, which greatly reduced the amount of
"creativity" that is demanded of the theorem prover. Another reason is
that it's possible to establish a Case Analysis-Synthesis Theorem (CAST)
that allows one to check logical equivalence in a very routine manner,
roughly analogous to truth tables but much more efficient and flexible.

Of course, having to draw the logical graphs in ASCII graphics is pretty klunky --
they are much quicker to sketch free hand and they are even better suited to
the construction of graph theoretic data structures in computer memory.

Feel free to use the talk page of that wiki article if you have any questions,
as I will probably be trying to make the presentation there a little clearer.

Jon Awbrey

inquiry e-lab:
p2p wiki:
zhongwen wp:
wp review:

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.