The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Another try...an innovative approach to FLT
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
James Harris

Posts: 16
Registered: 12/12/04
Another try...an innovative approach to FLT
Posted: Sep 25, 1996 8:41 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply



I've tried to get most of the hysterical emotion out of my approach.
I'll show what I have first and then show how I got it.

First off, this is about FLT so the usual about x^n + y^n = z^n applies.

The extra is that (x+y-z)^n = n(z-x)(z-y)(x+y)Q

where I use Q for all those other terms. For n=3, Q=1 because

(x+y-z)^3 = 3(z-x)(z-y)(x+y)

My conclusion is that

n(z-y)(x-y)^{n-2}[(x^2 - y^2)Q - z^{n-1}] must be divisible by

(z-x) which means that

[{x^2 - y^2)Q - z^{n-1}] must be divisible by (z-x) since none

of the other expressions are.

But letting y=af the moduli of z and x with respect to f are the same
as (z-x) = f^n and looking at the interior of the expression we see that
then Q must have the same moduli as z and x with respect to f. But then
the expression is only divisible by f^2 because of the (x^2 - y^2)Q.

For n=3, it's more obvious because Q=1 and you get x^2 - y^2 - z^2

which is obviously not divisible by f^n but only by f^2.


Where all of this come from is my expression for x^n + y^n = z^n where I
use x + delta x = my; y + delta y = mx; z + delta y = mz; to expand the
original expression.

I've done this before but I found that at the first level, my
denominators divided out, but then I finally got around to adding those
two terms and get the result from above.

It comes from subtracting

n(z-y)(delta y)^{n-1} from (delta x)^n

and using the substitution n(z-x)(z-y)(x+y)Q = (x+y-z)^n

and is easily verifiable.

I wonder if anyone will check after all of the other posts but that's
neither here nor there.

James Harris







Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.