The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Another try on FLT with no claim that it's worth anything.
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
James Harris

Posts: 16
Registered: 12/12/04
Another try on FLT with no claim that it's worth anything.
Posted: Sep 29, 1996 6:05 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I've been distracting myself from personal problems by playing around
with FLT. Being hardheaded I've both refused to accept that I'm trying
the impossible, and have continuously made posts that I had found
something only to find out later that I'd made some simple error. But
I'm still hardheaded so I keep posting...but no more claims to its worth.

I finally convinced myself that my previous methods weren't going to lead
to what I wanted, but because of them I started playing with something

(x+y-z)^n with x,y,z relatively prime, n odd prime;

because it held all of the information and was interesting besides.

For instance, if x^3 + y^3 = z^3 then (x+y-z)^3 = 3(z-x)(z-y)(x+y)

which is undoubtably trivial to you but interesting to me.

If I go higher, I find that

x^5 + y^5 = z^5 means that

(x+y-z)^5 = 5(z-x)(z-y)(x+y)[z^2 - (x+y)z + x^2 + xy + y^2]

In general, I just use

(x+y-z)^n = n(z-x)(z-y)(x+y)Q

For other primes other than n, I also have

(x+y-z)^a = a(z-x)(z-y)(x+y)Q(a) + x^a + y^a - z^a

Using the above, there's an easy proof for n=3.

Because x,y or z must be divisible by 3, either (z-x), (z-y) or (x+y)
must have a factor of 3^2 with other factors to the third.

If I use my last equation above and since all other odd primes are
greater than 3, the left side of the equation is divisible by 3^a and

x^a + y^a - z^a is divisible by 3^3, so I have to be able to divide the

a(z-x)(z-y)(x+y)Q(a) term by 3^3 as well. But, if for instance, (z-x)

has the 3^2 factor, none of the other terms can have a factor of 3, since
x,y,and z are relatively prime.

That is also a proof for why neither x,y nor z can be divisible by n, or
the same thing would work for them.

However, then it can then be seen that Q is forced to have a factor of

which didn't seem to lead to anything but I think I found something of

If I write

[x+y-(z-f)]^n = n[(z-f)-x][(z-f)-y](x+y)Q(f) + x^n + y^n - (z-f)^n

I find that because of Fermat's Little Theorem, my first terms on the
right have to be divisible by n.

If (z-f) is divisible by n then that requires that Q(f) be divisible by
n. But that puts an interesting requirement on some of the terms within
Q(f) and Q.

Especially when it's noted that I can use an f that doesn't make (z-f)
divisible by n and doesn't make any of the other terms besides Q(f)
divisible by n either.

I guess that's enough. One side note, if you look at the expression for
(x+y-z)^5, you notice that Q can't be divisible by 5.

That's enough typing for one sitting. I'm done.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.