The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: list and seq with maple and mupad
Replies: 2   Last Post: Oct 9, 1996 3:58 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Maltey UPS

Posts: 3
Registered: 12/8/04
list and seq with maple and mupad
Posted: Oct 8, 1996 12:27 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


In mathematical science, I know vector, matrix, set, list (or p-uple).
In mupad and maple these types are OK.

In a mathematical problem I write transformations as
[u1, u2, ... un] <<>> [u0, u1, ... un]
This is a basic transformation.

I can't do this with mupad and maple without a sequence.
I think it's "stupid" to use a sequence because it's an other type
I think it's difficult to explain to a student what a sequence is
(a list without brackets) and it's not very serious.

In LISP there are functions as cons, car, cdr, append.
In mupad and maple I only find list[1] for the car function.
in the others cases I must use sequence.

I don't want to use many many sequences because in math a result
without parenthesis or so isn't very serious.
So 1,2,3,4 (a sequence) is only one mathematical objet or four
But there is no problem with [1,2,3,4] : it's a 4-uple.

And now a dream and a question !

My dream : I want easy primitive functions on list

My question : Is there a serious reason that seq are so necessery
in computation with maple and mupad...

If you have any idea...

Excuse my poor english :

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.