The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Log[x]//TraditionalForm
Replies: 29   Last Post: Feb 16, 2009 4:39 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,838
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Log[]//TraditionalForm
Posted: Feb 13, 2009 3:44 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

It never fails to amaze me how dogmatic some people can be about the
conventions of notation.

Or how hard it is for some people to notice a tongue planted firmly
in a cheek.

On Feb 11, 2009, at 3:16 AM, slawek wrote:

> U=BFytkownik "Lou Talman" <> napisa=B3 w wiadomo=B6ci
> news:gmrm45$9m4$

>> The notational distinction between "ln" and "log" makes sense for
>> engineers who must use both natural logarithms and common
>> logarithms. But in advanced mathematics there is only one logarithm.

> False. The ln/log/alog was introduced when base ten logarithms was
> applied
> to calculation like:

--Lou Talman
Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
Metropolitan State College of Denver


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.