The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.research

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Cantor like set - with smaller "measure" ?
Replies: 3   Last Post: Feb 8, 2009 7:17 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 14
Registered: 5/21/07
Re: Cantor like set - with smaller "measure" ?
Posted: Feb 8, 2009 7:17 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Feb 7, 3:42Êam, wrote:
> Hi,
> if X is the cantor set then, X + X = Ê{x+y:x,y belong to X} = [0,2]
> Is there an uncountable set, Y such that the measure of Y+Y is zero?
> Thanks,
> Bhawanvi

Well, actually more is true. Erdos and Volkmann construct a subgroup
of the real line (with addition as the operation) which has any
prescribed Hausdorff dimension, including dimension = 1, in which case
the subgroup is actually proper, of course. It fairly easily follows
than that such a subgroup must have measure 0. This is because a
result by Steinhaus which says that if E is a set of positive measure,
then E + E contains an open interval, so G would have to be the entire
line. The Math Reviews reference to the article is below:

MR0186782 (32 #4238)

As ever,


* Vladimir Drobot
* Retired and gainfully unemployed

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.