The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Courses » ap-stat

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: APSTAT LIST General Comments
Replies: 1   Last Post: Nov 27, 1996 10:23 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Rudy Wiegand

Posts: 18
Registered: 12/6/04
APSTAT LIST General Comments
Posted: Nov 27, 1996 5:59 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Last week it was suggested to a subscriber that they take an introductory
course in statistics. As a result, I'd like to make some comments concerning
this forum. In general A.P. teachers are assigned by school administrators.
Frequently, they have had a single college level statistics course--perhaps
none. It is unlikely that more than a few have had a relatively large
number of courses. I suspect that virtually all of those assigned to teach
these courses want to do the best job possible. Yet, many faced with
minimal preparation are frightened at the situation they find themselves now
facing. I hope that this forum can help, not only those of us with some
experience in the field; but, also those of us with minimal preparation.
Taking a course next summer is too late for today's activities.

Over the past few months we have had many negative messages concerning
confidence intervals and z-tests. The point is moot. Both are in the acorn
book--both must be taught. Add to this statement, that our students will be
using handheld calculators on the test and again the point is moot. If we
wish to encourage the board to make a change, I can accept that; however,
since virtually every business/science major over the past 50 years has been
taught confidence intervals, it seems unlikely to me that ignoring them in
an introductory course is wise. Further, I suspect that a fair number of
practicing statisticians use sophisticated techniques in practice BUT
"prove" the outcome to their business bosses with a C.I. technique of some sort.

So, to those of you with decades of experience, please accept my appologies
in advance for that idiot question I will assuredly ask--I, like many
others, am simply trying to do the best possible job for my students.

One last comment on netiquette--I send my thanks directly to the
transmitter--saves everyone from getting an unnecessary message.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.