On Wednesday, July 8, 2009 12:17:25 AM UTC-5, Alan Morgan wrote: > In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, > Constructive Truth <email@example.com> wrote: > > >I am afraid, necessarily you misunderstand the direct language of my > >claim. > > > >My claim is: > > > >1. every prime is of the form 2N+1. > > Not only is your statement trivial and completely uninteresting (every > prime number is odd. Really? Could that be because even numbers are, > by definition, divisible by 2, and thus not prime?), it isn't even > completely correct. 2 is a prime, but is not of the form 2N+1. > > So your claim is both trivial and false. Have no fear! One minor > change: > > Musatov-Morgan Theorem > Every prime > 2 is of the form 2N+1 > > and it's now trivial and true. What's next? A variation on the > Goldbach Conjecture where you hypothesize that every number > 2 > can be written as the sum of two other numbers? > > Alan > -- > Defendit numerus
I have no fear but I prefer to have not no fear, would thy permit?