The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Software » comp.soft-sys.matlab

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: sub-pixel shifting of a matrix
Replies: 14   Last Post: Feb 7, 2013 12:23 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Matt J

Posts: 4,997
Registered: 11/28/09
Re: sub-pixel shifting of a matrix
Posted: Feb 7, 2013 11:49 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Bruno Luong" <b.luong@fogale.findmycountry> wrote in message <keuml4$rtj$>...
> "Matt J" wrote in message <keuln5$onb$>...

> >
> > Maybe, but only because there are some funny sub-optimal things happening inside conv2 implementation-wise, and because the interpolation kernel here happens to be small. There's no way the 3rd version below should be the slowest.

> Of course. The reason is obvious: 2+2 = 2*2, but 10+10 << 10*10.


That doesn't explain why the 3rd version was the slowest. The 3rd version uses a 10+10 tensorial operation so since 10+10 << 10*10, you would expect the 3rd version to be faster (or comparable to) the others.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.