The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Courses » ap-stat

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: [ap-stat] Harvard and AP Stats.
Replies: 4   Last Post: Dec 24, 2009 10:16 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 1,301
Registered: 12/6/04
Re:[ap-stat] Harvard and AP Stats.
Posted: Dec 24, 2009 9:26 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Me thinks the good doctor from Harvard may have an inflated opinion of himself and his work. People who are truly educated and enlightened do not thumb their noses at other people's efforts but, rather, support and encourage them. Perhaps the rarified air of the esteemed Cambridge institution has diluted his ability to think clearly. I find those kind of people the "most boring of all."

We need to be thankful for the support of those truly educated and enlightened individuals like Dr. Alan Rossman, Dr. Richard Schaeffer, Dr. Beth Chance, Dr. Christine Franklin, Dr. Brad Hartlaub, et. al. to name just a very few, who realize the importance of this work.

And finally, we must never forget to mention the efforts of Dr. Christopher Olsen, the sage of the cornbelt and all things midwestern. At least his feet are on the ground, muddy or snowy as that may be, and not flitting about in some ether, or whatever it is that they call that New England air.

>>> "David Bee" <> 12/24/09 8:44 AM >>>
Michael and Others:

Michael writes:

But let's for a moment, grant his statement as true, and investigate why it might be. AP Stats has been growing tremendously since its inception. Many math teachers begin teaching AP Stats with little or no real background in statistics, and when thrown into this subject, spend one to several years floundering about, and presenting "the most boring class ever" (by the way, I'm using my own background as the model here, I'm sure not all parts apply to all AP Stats teachers). Why did they not have a good background in Statistics? Because the intro class they took (in college) was the most boring math class ever.


Wrt the last sentence above, one can't imagine a math-stat course
being the most boring math class. For those who've been reading
my Today's Birthday postings[a big one today(Dec 24th) about the
founder of Harvard's Stat Dept], one point occasionally made was
that one big reason for the belated interest in Stat by those with
BA/BS degrees in Math is that during the first 80-100 years of the
twentieth century there was a deep anti-Stat attitude among most in
most Math departments. (David Salsburg, in at least one portion of
LTT, discussed this.) Anecdotally, I experienced this while getting
bachelor's and master's degrees in Math-Ed (and so went for a
second MS in Stat...;^)), and truly believe what I've read about an
anti-Stat attitude being prevalent in math departments for a long

-- David Bee

PS: Some colleges sans Stat departments have formed Stat groups
within their Math departments [Stat sub-department?] (I believe
Syracuse Univ has had one for a long time), and believe more such
groups will result as a result of the APStat course...

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
To unsubscribe click here:
To change your subscription address or other settings click here:

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
To unsubscribe click here:
To change your subscription address or other settings click here:

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.