The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Hamiltonian cycles on directed graphs
Replies: 2   Last Post: Jun 5, 2010 7:32 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
King, Peter R

Posts: 32
Registered: 11/15/05
Re: Hamiltonian cycles on directed graphs
Posted: Jun 5, 2010 7:32 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

OOps I don't know what happened there on my screen it looks like a->b not a(r)b (NB it does not imply b->a). I'm sorry about that I think it must have been the incompatability of fonts.
From: [] On Behalf Of Murray Eisenberg []
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: Hamiltonian cycles on directed graphs

Please explain your notation: does something like a(r)b mean you have
both a->b and b->a ?

On 6/3/2010 5:40 AM, King, Peter R wrote:
> My understanding is that, currently, the Hamiltonian cycles function does not work properly on directed graphs. Is there a way round this? For example I have the directed graph
> z == {a(r)b,a(r)d,b(r)c, b->i,c (r)a,c (r)k,d(r)e,d(r)g,e(r)f,e(r)c,f(r)d,f(r)l,g(r)h,g(r)a,h(r)i,h(r)f,i(r)g,i(r)j,j(r)l,j(r)b,k(r)j,k(r)e,l(r)k,l(r)h};
> for which I would like the Hamiltonian cycles (can I specify which vertex I start from - although this is unimportant in this example).
> One small point, I can plot this in 2D and get arrows to show the directionality but in 3D I am struggling.
> Thanks

Murray Eisenberg
80 Fearing Street phone 413 549-1020 (H)
Amherst, MA 01002-1912

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.