
Re: RE: Test Seems OK  but missing items
Posted:
Jun 15, 2010 7:34 PM



We had 16 take the test with a range of 21 to 82 with a mean of 61.8.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Kathy Noftsier <mathkat@twcny.rr.com>wrote:
> We had 31 take the test with a range of 42 to 85 with 5 of them in the > 80's. The mean was 65.4. > > Kathy Noftsier > Beaver River >  Original Message  From: "John Keller" <johnkeller@verizon.net> > To: <nyshsmath@mathforum.org> > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:56 PM > Subject: Re: RE: Test Seems OK  but missing items > > > > So far our scores are ranging from a low of 37 to a high of 81 (just one >> of those, I'm afraid), mean 60.6 (and SD 9.95, for you real geeks out >> there). I agree with the comments about too much of too little in the >> course, and I won't wear any white shirts in case of tomatoes. Next year we >> will trim some of the instruction in order to do a targeted review. No trig >> graphs, no "onto", no inverse trig, no writing inverse, no decent log  and >> these were the topics we WERE able to review. I hope Kirk is right about >> the 40. >> ******************************************************************* >> * To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message >> * "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org >> * >> * Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at >> * http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671 >> ******************************************************************* >> > > ******************************************************************* > * To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message > * "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org > * > * Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at > * http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671 > ******************************************************************* >

