|
|
Re: RE: Test Seems OK - but missing items
Posted:
Jun 15, 2010 7:34 PM
|
|
|
|
We had 16 take the test with a range of 21 to 82 with a mean of 61.8.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Kathy Noftsier <mathkat@twcny.rr.com>wrote:
> We had 31 take the test with a range of 42 to 85 with 5 of them in the
> 80's. The mean was 65.4.
>
> Kathy Noftsier
> Beaver River
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Keller" <johnkeller@verizon.net>
> To: <nyshsmath@mathforum.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:56 PM
> Subject: Re: RE: Test Seems OK - but missing items
>
>
>
> So far our scores are ranging from a low of 37 to a high of 81 (just one
>> of those, I'm afraid), mean 60.6 (and SD 9.95, for you real geeks out
>> there). I agree with the comments about too much of too little in the
>> course, and I won't wear any white shirts in case of tomatoes. Next year we
>> will trim some of the instruction in order to do a targeted review. No trig
>> graphs, no "onto", no inverse trig, no writing inverse, no decent log - and
>> these were the topics we WERE able to review. I hope Kirk is right about
>> the 40.
>> *******************************************************************
>> * To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message
>> * "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org
>> *
>> * Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at
>> * http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671
>> *******************************************************************
>>
>
> *******************************************************************
> * To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message
> * "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org
> *
> * Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at
> * http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671
> *******************************************************************
>
|
|
