Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Software » comp.soft-sys.matlab

Topic: ImageJ vs. Image Processing Toolkit
Replies: 12   Last Post: Oct 17, 2013 8:49 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Yair Altman

Posts: 1,347
Registered: 3/19/07
ImageJ vs. Image Processing Toolkit
Posted: Aug 25, 2010 2:24 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Many are aware that there are two main alternatives for image processing in Matlab:
- MathWork's commercial Image Processing Toolkit (IPT) - http://www.mathworks.com/products/image/
- The open-source ImageJ toolkit - http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/

(I know there are others, but let's focus this thread on the two above which appear to be the most popular - let's not start a religious war here)

The basic comparison between IPT/ImageJ is simple:
- IPT costs $$$; ImageJ is free
- IPT is proprietary; ImageJ is public-domain
- IPT is Matlab-friendly; ImageJ requires Java integration/knowledge

Can users of both toolkits provide a more technical comparison of IPT vs. ImageJ? For example: extensibility (e.g., creating filters), ease of use, performance, memory, bugs, features, accuracy, documentation, etc.

ImageAnalyst - are you there?...

Thanks,
Yair Altman
http://UndocumentedMatlab.com



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.