The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » calc_reform

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Re: Definition of the exponential and natural logarithm
functions [was....doozi]

Replies: 3   Last Post: Oct 19, 2001 1:28 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 160
Registered: 12/4/04
Re: Definition of the exponential and natural logarithm
functions [was....doozi]

Posted: Oct 17, 2001 4:05 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Mon, 15 Oct Lou Talman wrote in part:

:There are three principal methods for giving rigorous definitions of the
:exponential/logarithm pair of functions:
: 1. Definite integral
: 2. Series
: 3. Extension by continuity.

Listowner Flashman replies:

: A fourth approach to the definition of the natural exponential function
: can be based on the differential equation y'=y with y(0)=1 - motivated by
: population growth models, amd made credible using a mixture of
: differential equation heuristics and properties of solutions to DE's that
: are accessible to first year calculus students.

The operative word here is *rigorous*.
There certainly is a rigorous theory of differential equations,
based on existence and uniqueness theorems. It would be
somewhat misguided to introduce freshmen to these things.

An axiomatic approach, in contrast, based on, say, a
functional equation and continuity, obviates the need for
developing machinery, and encapsulates the fundamental
facts based from which the properties of the function are derived.

However, if rigor is not an important consideration (and of course
there are definitions of rigor that are very forgiving indeed) then
I would say the differential equation approach is at least on a
par with the other three.

It is almost impossible to predict which of these approaches will
be most attractive to a given set of students!

P.S. How about the definition exp(x) = lim( {1 + x/n}^n, n -> infinity}?




To UNSUBSCRIBE from the calc-reform mailing list,
send mail to:

with the following in the message body:

unsubscribe calc-reform your_email_address

-Information on the subject line is disregarded.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.