Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Unusual notation
Replies: 13   Last Post: Mar 8, 2011 4:05 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Brian M. Scott Posts: 1,289 Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Unusual notation
Posted: Mar 4, 2011 8:34 PM

On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:13:23 -0500, David Bernier
<david250@videotron.ca> wrote in
<news:ikra4906sr@news1.newsguy.com> in

[...]

> I'm wondering if you might have this edition:
> "New Age International, 1982 - 379 pages" as shown here:

> I do seem to remember a notation quite similar to this:

>|
>|
>| n
>|____

> (page 82, 3.3 Solved Problems, Example 3).

> I'm pretty sure I saw it earlier in the book. If it's a
> match (around page 82), you might look earlier in the
> book, e.g. Example 9, page 63:

> "Show that for any number x, lim x^n / (|_ (n) ) = 0.

> [Solution]

> Let a_n = x^n / (|_ (n) ) .

> (therefore) a_{n+1}/a_n = x^{n+1}/(|_ (n+1) ) * (|_ (n) ) / x_n

I'm pretty sure that that last should be x^n, not x_n.

> = x/(n+1) [etc.] "

Here it's clearly the factorial: [x^(n+1)/(n+1)!] * n!/x^n =
x/(n+1).

[...]

Brian