The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Re: [mg5094] 3.0 = Rip Roaring Resource Hog :-(
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Daryl Reece

Posts: 23
Registered: 12/7/04
Re: [mg5094] 3.0 = Rip Roaring Resource Hog :-(
Posted: Nov 7, 1996 12:41 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I like the generality of Mathematica. It's this generality that will
allow you to write this ByteArray header if you want. See if
stripping off MMA's headers will reduce the size significantly. I
believe the problem with specialized data structures is then writing
the rules and code to allow existing functions to deal with them.

Regarding your comment about resources. Remember your time is
probably the most precious resource so if spending $1000 on RAM will
allow you to formulate problems 100% faster, I'd say it's a good


Mark Evans <> wrote:

>I would prefer if Mathematica would let me, the user, decide just how much
>generality to sacrifice to memory and time constraints. If Mathematica had an
>object like ByteArray[], then I myself could choose whether to put my data into
>a List[] or ByteArray[], depending on my needs. Programs like LabVIEW, for
>example, let the programmer decide about the data type but still handle the
>underlying memory management and loop iteration issues for him.

>That's emPOWerment!


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.