The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: $\Omega$$
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  

Posts: 4
From: Russia
Registered: 5/25/11
Posted: May 31, 2011 6:09 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

With Von Neumann's definition of $\Omega$ , the ordinal set , we have $[0,\
omega)=\omega \forall \omega \in \Omega$ . In fact with Von Neumann approach ,
$\Omega$ cannot be considred as a set ( since $\\Omega$ is itself well-
ordered and belong to itself .

With the "modern" definition of $\Omega$ that consist in defining the
ordinals as the equivalence classes of well-ordered sets ( two well ordered
sets being equivalent if there exist a monotonous bijective mapping between
them ) , do we still have this property ? Apparently yes because the
demopnstration by transfinite induction is still valid .

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.