Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Chapt8 well defined "open set" and well-defined Reals in light of
10^603 #523 Correcting Math 3rd ed

Replies: 10   Last Post: Aug 8, 2011 8:14 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Earle Jones

Posts: 167
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Chapt8: well-defined Reals in light of 10^603 #524 Correcting Math 3rd ed
Posted: Aug 8, 2011 6:47 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <LowSp.33495$m22.15361@newsfe05.ams2>,
"Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics.June.2011> wrote:

> "Earle Jones" <earle.jones@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:earle.jones-4E6487.21540410072011@news.giganews.com...
> | In article
> | <f8639f7e-7439-4d60-8fd8-855ae0db23a6@v8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
> | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> wrote:
> |
> | [...]
> |
> | > So what is the square root of 2? If Irrationals are just imprecise
> | > notions? Well, you take the square root of 2 out
> | > to 603 decimal places to the right of the decimal point. It is still a
> | > rational number and it is what the square root of
> | > 2 really is....
> |
> | *
> | Archie: If sqrt(2) is rational (as you say above), it can be written
> | as
> |
> | sqrt(2) = a/b
> |
> | where a and b are integers (definition of a rational number.)
> |
> | Please tell us what integers a and b are.
> |
> | Thanks,
> |
> | earle
> | *
> Oh dear... now you've left yourself open to accepting the burden of proof
> instead of leaving it to Archie.
> a = 54608393
> b = 38613965
>
>
> Of course if you'll accept four figure accuracy then
> a = 8119
> b = 5741
>
> is good enough, and for two figure accuracy
> a = 99, b = 70
>
> There exists two integers a and b such that a/b = sqrt(2) to any desired
> accuracy.
> Provide a counter-example (or other disproof).


*
The proof that sqrt(2) is irrational is a freshman algebra exercise.
What that means is that sqrt(2) cannot be expressed as the ratio of two
integers (definition of irrational.) It can certainly be 'approximated'
to whatever degree of accuracy one wants.

earle
*



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.