Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: algebra regents 2011
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jun 20, 2011 3:05 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Luisahaw@aol.com Posts: 31 Registered: 12/3/04
Re: Re: algebra regents 2011
Posted: Jun 17, 2011 5:29 PM

I was assigned to grade question 39. I gave a paper only 3 points because the student chose to box in the solution space. He used a solid line when it clearily was suppose to be dotted. The student's teacher argued with me stating he did use a dotted line for the lower part of the inequality _3x +7. the part that was not the solution space. She insists thats how she teaches it. She expected the student to have a perfect paper, but he already missed a multiple choice.

So was I too strict with the 4 point rubric? I didn't think so. Now there is no telling if she will change my score without my knowledge. Thanks

Luisa Duerr
Binghamton

----------
This AOL Mail was sent from AT&T's Wireless network using Mobile Email

------Original Message------
From: Vera Sinnreich <v_sinnreich@hotmail.com>
To: <nyshsmath@mathforum.org>
Date: Friday, June 17, 2011 3:35:43 PM UTC
Subject: Re: algebra regents 2011

I found question 22 poorly worded and ambiguous. The independent variable could be the cost (I think they meant "the price") of carrots, in which case choice 2 would be the correct response. Had the problem stated that "a study showed that DECREASING the price of ..." this would be a fair assumption However, in "A DECREASE in the cost of ...", the decrease itself is the subject and, thus, the variable being discussed. In this case, the correct response would be choice 1.

I am fairly certain that the author of this question had the first scenario in mind and, this scenario being the more conventional one, that most people reading this question , students and teachers alike, will read it in that way. But we cannot insist on precise mathematical language in our students' communication unless we are willing to hold ourselves accountable to the same standards. And the second interpretation is linguistically more appropriate. Thus, in my humble opinion, both answers should be accepted as correct.

In the light of the changes in the scoring policy, by which we cannot revisit exams with scores close to 65, we owe it to our students to maximize their opportunities right from the start. If you agree, please contact SED at (518) 474-8220.
*******************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message
* "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org
*
* http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671
*******************************************************************

*******************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message
* "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org
*
* http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671
*******************************************************************

Date Subject Author
6/16/11 L.C.
6/16/11 Nanette DeGroat
6/17/11 precopio@nycap.rr.com
6/17/11 Kevin Wolpert
6/17/11 Luisahaw@aol.com
6/17/11 Kathy
6/18/11 MathCaryl@aol.com
6/19/11 Evan Romer
6/19/11 Evan Romer
6/17/11 Jessalyn
6/17/11 mfreebern
6/17/11 Vera Sinnreich
6/17/11 Tom Kenyon
6/18/11 bill wickes
6/17/11 JFish@csufsd.org
6/17/11 Guest
6/17/11 ElizWaite@aol.com
6/18/11 Meg Clemens
6/18/11 MathCaryl@aol.com
6/18/11 Bob
6/19/11 Roberta M. Eisenberg
6/20/11 ezseller@mail.nasboces.org
6/20/11 Roberta M. Eisenberg
6/20/11 precopio@nycap.rr.com
6/20/11 precopio@nycap.rr.com
6/20/11 Tom Kenyon
6/20/11 Guest
6/20/11 precopio@nycap.rr.com