Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math.independent

Topic: Labor statistics
Replies: 2   Last Post: Jul 11, 2011 5:52 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
root

Posts: 50
Registered: 8/26/09
Labor statistics
Posted: Jul 11, 2011 11:43 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Two recent employment reports have differed so widely as
to suggest to me that either something grossly improbable
has happened or that a serious error has been made.

Last Thursday the company ADP, which provides data processing
services for over 500,000 companies, published a report
that non-farm employment rose by 157,000 jobs in the month
of June. The ADP report was based upon a survey of 340,000
companies. That report can be seen here:
www.adpemploymentreport.com/PDF/FINAL_Release_June11.pdf

The very next day The Bureau Of Labor Statistics published
their report that during June the non-farm employment
rose by 18,000 jobs. The BLS report was based upon a
survey of 140,000 companies. This report can be seen here:
www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

The historical agreement over the last 10 years of these
two employment estimates can be seen in a graph covering
the period of 2005-2010 here:
www.adpemploymentreport.com/ner/charting.aspx

Stock markets around the world were buffeted by the
two reports, first up on the ADP report and down after
the BLS report.

I have tried to make simple models of how ADP and the
BLS might have generated these numbers. These models
result in a ratio distribution whose parameters are
not available, but assuming that the two estimates
should be highly correlated and that the width of
either distribution is much smaller than the median,
I find the discrepancy to be too great to explain by
sampling. It seems to me that some serious error has
been made.

I invite comments by interested parties in this group.

Thanks.





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.