GS Chandy Posted: Oct 26, 2011 3:04 AM > >> Nobody cares if OPMS produces lists or closed >> sed solutions or open solutions or ham sandwiches. > >I'm happy to learn that. If true, I find it remarkable, >indeed astonishing, that Robert Hansen (and you) should >have spent so much time and effort in claiming >that "OPMS produces lists and nothing else!"; "OPMS is >a list-making tool and is therefore worthless"; (and so >on, to such effect, almost ad infinitum).
We are off to a bad start. You are confusing the amount of time you spend on promoting and defending OPMS with the amount of time I have spent commenting on it, which can be usefully measured in a few mintues. And I am already starting to regret them.
If you have something useful to say about OPMS, please get on with it.
>In this context, I observe that to tackle a problem >that is "familiar and interesting to you specifically >(or to Robert Hansen or both of you)", you would have >to input the 'elements' that you so scorn. Without >that, any suggested 'resolution' (note - not "solution" >in the sense that you may consider to be one) may not >be entirely satisfactory to you, because that >resolution would be based on someone else's ideas.
Don't worry about me or Robert. Just take your best guess at what might be generally interesting to this forum, formulate what you think constitutes a solution, and get on with it.
>As noted, you would definitely have to read - at least >casually, but effectively - some of the OPMS literature >in order to understand what it is all about.
I have read all the OPMS I am going to read. However, for the sake of this exercise, I will answer whatever questions you put to me, and I hope that other correspondents to Math-Teach will do the same.